Laboratory projects

These are major and often funded projects in the CogNeW laboratory that often involve multiple students or staff members.

 
 

Individual differences in cognition & brain organization

Over the past 20 years, the study of functional brain networks has helped us understand how brain regions interact to bring about complex cognitive functions such as cognitive control. However, functional networks mapped within individuals differ greatly, and especially in regions involved in attention and cognitive control. These functional network maps in individuals often do not coincide with group-average task-activity maps in between-subjects’ studies. This fact opens the door for opportunities to study networks within individuals, whether they relate to individual differences in behavior, and how they can guide treatments. We use rest and task-based fMRI to inform our understanding of human cognition by mapping functional networks within individuals and examining the relationship between these individually-estimated networks and cognitive functions. Through this effort, we can better inform targets for neuromodulation and potentially enhance cognitive abilities.

Left: even in two individuals, we can see significant variability in where fMRI finds networks of interest. We ask: “What does this mean?”

 

Network Neuroscience in Aphasia - What is the basis of language loss and outcomes?


The human brain features structurally and functionally connected regions we understand as a network. Our lab is interested in determining how the properties of brain networks shape cognition, specifically the neurobiology of language. To do so, we use various neuroimaging methods to distill the complexity of the brain into a network and then examine how topological properties of brain regions are related to language. We also extend this work to patients with language deficits, such as chronic stroke (aphasia) and neurodegenerative disease (primary progressive aphasia). Using quantitative network models and measures, we can distinguish how a healthy brain network differs from a patient brain, how those differences correspond to language deficits, and if neuromodulation can improve patient outcomes using a network-guided approach.

Left: Image of connections lost in a left hemisphere stroke. Damage to the brain to even apparently small parts of the brain can have large impacts on the overall network. We ask: “What network properties best characterize behavior and outcomes?”

 

Developing Novel Neurotechnologies for Imaging and Stimulation

While individualized brain mapping helps solve the question of where to stimulate, a challenge in cognitive enhancement is when to stimulate. EEG has been a mainstay in brain monitoring for over 100 years. However, most EEG research has only studied what brainwaves look like after the fact - for example, how they change when people do a difficult mental task versus rest. Using advanced systems, it is possible to "close the loop" and do experiments that track and intervene on ongoing brainwaves to improve cognition. For example, a "closed-loop EEG system might monitor a particular brainwave, and then trigger transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to fire exactly when that brainwave reaches a peak. There is increasing evidence that this timing is an important determinant of TMS effects on the brain and cognition. We have several projects focused on tracking, resetting, and controlling brain phases.

Left, Top: Benchmarking software for brain tracking and triggered TMS.

Left, Bottom: Testing whether next-generation electrodes are TMS-compatible.

 

Even when people think a use of brain stimulation is morally acceptable, they still might not be willing to use it. Why?

Public Opinions About Brain Stimulation & Neurolaw

We have performed several studies of public attitudes about whether it is right and wrong to use brain stimulation and how risks and benefits influence decisions. In addition, we have provided critiques of how assumptions of brain function should or should not influence legal practices and under what conditions brain stimulation is a threat to human autonomy.